<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Evil Duckie</title>
	<link>http://www.evilduckie.org</link>
	<description>Evil Duckie's Tech Musings</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 11:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook’s contemporary face by PR</title>
		<link>http://www.evilduckie.org/facebooks-contemporary-face#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>PR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 07:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.evilduckie.org/facebooks-contemporary-face#comment-218</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don’t like the new facebook much.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s bearable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And google chrome is awesome.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t like the new facebook much.</p>
<p>It’s bearable.</p>
<p>And google chrome is awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook’s contemporary face by krkhan</title>
		<link>http://www.evilduckie.org/facebooks-contemporary-face#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>krkhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 05:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.evilduckie.org/facebooks-contemporary-face#comment-217</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The new Facebook will become more bearable in near future  At the very least we can say that it is improving, something which we couldn’t declare for the old design.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I rest my case against Chrome because of your proclamation of it being awesome  .&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new Facebook will become more bearable in near future  At the very least we can say that it is improving, something which we couldn’t declare for the old design.</p>
<p>I rest my case against Chrome because of your proclamation of it being awesome  .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CRUD Scaffold Generator by Clinton R. Nixon</title>
		<link>http://www.evilduckie.org/crud-scaffold-generator#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Clinton R. Nixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.evilduckie.org/crud-scaffold-generator#comment-87</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I find it hard to imagine that any Rails developer anyway wants to make it easier at the expense of quality code. Even if one did, though, REST is not a hard concept at all to understand. To say that REST makes it hard for beginners to get started with Rails - to say that you’ll avoid it in your courses - is an insult to the people you teach.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The structure of REST is amazingly simple, and it simplifies working with Rails. Perhaps your assumptions about its difficulty come from your familiarity with pre-REST Rails, which I can understand. You’re incorrect, though.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it hard to imagine that any Rails developer anyway wants to make it easier at the expense of quality code. Even if one did, though, REST is not a hard concept at all to understand. To say that REST makes it hard for beginners to get started with Rails - to say that you’ll avoid it in your courses - is an insult to the people you teach.</p>
<p>The structure of REST is amazingly simple, and it simplifies working with Rails. Perhaps your assumptions about its difficulty come from your familiarity with pre-REST Rails, which I can understand. You’re incorrect, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CRUD Scaffold Generator by Kevin Skoglund</title>
		<link>http://www.evilduckie.org/crud-scaffold-generator#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Skoglund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.evilduckie.org/crud-scaffold-generator#comment-86</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I didn’t say REST was hard and I never said I would avoid it in my courses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I said that it is a lot to throw at a beginner.  Maybe you have enough experience to make the leap straight to REST, but I work with students from a wide variety of backgrounds and many don’t.  Most beginners are not coming from an object-oriented background and have little or no experience with an MVC framework.  Some beginners have only a small understanding of the difference between GET and POST, much less PUT and DELETE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is my opinion based on my teaching experience (and you are welcome to disagree) that it is easier for beginners to understand the fundamentals of Rails, and then learn REST from there.  Essentially to say: look how this is just like what you were doing in language X before and see how much easier it is in Rails.  Once they have made that switch, you can move on to learn REST from there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Like I said, I hope it helps beginners.  I know that it will help me to teach them.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn’t say REST was hard and I never said I would avoid it in my courses.</p>
<p>I said that it is a lot to throw at a beginner.  Maybe you have enough experience to make the leap straight to REST, but I work with students from a wide variety of backgrounds and many don’t.  Most beginners are not coming from an object-oriented background and have little or no experience with an MVC framework.  Some beginners have only a small understanding of the difference between GET and POST, much less PUT and DELETE.</p>
<p>It is my opinion based on my teaching experience (and you are welcome to disagree) that it is easier for beginners to understand the fundamentals of Rails, and then learn REST from there.  Essentially to say: look how this is just like what you were doing in language X before and see how much easier it is in Rails.  Once they have made that switch, you can move on to learn REST from there.</p>
<p>Like I said, I hope it helps beginners.  I know that it will help me to teach them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CRUD Scaffold Generator by Kevin Skoglund</title>
		<link>http://www.evilduckie.org/crud-scaffold-generator#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Skoglund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.evilduckie.org/crud-scaffold-generator#comment-84</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Lucy, thank you for the kind words and for your perspective on scaffolding.  I’ll definitely keep it in mind.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And FWIW, we are working right now on updating the Lynda.com Ruby on Rails training to the newest version.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucy, thank you for the kind words and for your perspective on scaffolding.  I’ll definitely keep it in mind.</p>
<p>And FWIW, we are working right now on updating the Lynda.com Ruby on Rails training to the newest version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CRUD Scaffold Generator by A Fresh Cup » Blog Archive » Double Shot #238</title>
		<link>http://www.evilduckie.org/crud-scaffold-generator#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>A Fresh Cup » Blog Archive » Double Shot #238</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 04:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.evilduckie.org/crud-scaffold-generator#comment-83</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] CRUD Scaffold Generator - Rails’ original non-RESTful scaffolding lives on in a plugin. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] CRUD Scaffold Generator - Rails’ original non-RESTful scaffolding lives on in a plugin. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CRUD Scaffold Generator by Lucy</title>
		<link>http://www.evilduckie.org/crud-scaffold-generator#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 04:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.evilduckie.org/crud-scaffold-generator#comment-85</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I see your objection, here, but I’m not sure I entirely agree. I started learning Rails about six months ago, and as such I have only ever used the RESTful scaffolding. I was coming from a background of zero programming knowledge - I knew extremely basic html and that was it. I didn’t realy find it a barrier - as you say, there’s so much to learn, so it’s just one more thing among many. Maybe for those coming from other programming langauges the old version was easier to grasp, but I can say that as a complete n00b it makes no real difference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That said, I completely agree with the principle behind what you’re saying. I’ve been following your Lynda.com course and it’s defnitely the best introduction to Rails I’ve come across. The reason for that is your step-by-step approach, so that the priciples behind what’s happening are very clear. Since I already had experience generating the RESTful scaffold (and I knew the course was a version or so  behind the Rails version I was using) I just assumed things were done differently in the old version, but followed the principles, and I’ve found that really, really awesome. But just explaining the principles the same way would have worked, I think, even when generating a RESTful scaffold. Again as a new user, I’d always rather learn the best practice way to do it from the get-go - it’s just having the priciples behind the Rails defaults explained that really makes the difference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All that said, I LOVE your course, I think you’re the best Rails trainer out there. I  hope to see a bnew version for the updated Rails soon. So, if your experiecne as a teacher suggests this update is bad news, I’m definitely willing to believe you could be right. But I thought you might be interested to hear the perspective of someone who is both new to Rails and a user of your course.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks again!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see your objection, here, but I’m not sure I entirely agree. I started learning Rails about six months ago, and as such I have only ever used the RESTful scaffolding. I was coming from a background of zero programming knowledge - I knew extremely basic html and that was it. I didn’t realy find it a barrier - as you say, there’s so much to learn, so it’s just one more thing among many. Maybe for those coming from other programming langauges the old version was easier to grasp, but I can say that as a complete n00b it makes no real difference.</p>
<p>That said, I completely agree with the principle behind what you’re saying. I’ve been following your Lynda.com course and it’s defnitely the best introduction to Rails I’ve come across. The reason for that is your step-by-step approach, so that the priciples behind what’s happening are very clear. Since I already had experience generating the RESTful scaffold (and I knew the course was a version or so  behind the Rails version I was using) I just assumed things were done differently in the old version, but followed the principles, and I’ve found that really, really awesome. But just explaining the principles the same way would have worked, I think, even when generating a RESTful scaffold. Again as a new user, I’d always rather learn the best practice way to do it from the get-go - it’s just having the priciples behind the Rails defaults explained that really makes the difference.</p>
<p>All that said, I LOVE your course, I think you’re the best Rails trainer out there. I  hope to see a bnew version for the updated Rails soon. So, if your experiecne as a teacher suggests this update is bad news, I’m definitely willing to believe you could be right. But I thought you might be interested to hear the perspective of someone who is both new to Rails and a user of your course.</p>
<p>Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CRUD Scaffold Generator by ellioman</title>
		<link>http://www.evilduckie.org/crud-scaffold-generator#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>ellioman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.evilduckie.org/crud-scaffold-generator#comment-82</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;“And FWIW, we are working right now on updating the Lynda.com Ruby on Rails training to the newest version.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Great to hear.
I am currently going through your Essential Ruby class and had a problem in the “Scaffold: Magic CRUD”. I just skipped that chapter and I’m going strong  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Great classes and I hope you continue to produce more…!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers from Iceland
Elvar&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“And FWIW, we are working right now on updating the Lynda.com Ruby on Rails training to the newest version.”</p>
<p>Great to hear.<br />
I am currently going through your Essential Ruby class and had a problem in the “Scaffold: Magic CRUD”. I just skipped that chapter and I’m going strong  </p>
<p>Great classes and I hope you continue to produce more…!</p>
<p>Cheers from Iceland<br />
Elvar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CRUD Scaffold Generator by Aditya</title>
		<link>http://www.evilduckie.org/crud-scaffold-generator#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Aditya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 04:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.evilduckie.org/crud-scaffold-generator#comment-81</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Seeing maximum number of RoR articles on your weblog,it is not difficult to guess your favourite programmimg language. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have been following some of your articles for quiet some time now. Sometimes when one knows two or more scripting languages, he may be confused while selecting a language  for a particular project. How do you decide? For example both RoR and PHP can be used to develop data driven web applications. Also when do you choose between Javascript or PHP or RoR for form field validation.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing maximum number of RoR articles on your weblog,it is not difficult to guess your favourite programmimg language. </p>
<p>I have been following some of your articles for quiet some time now. Sometimes when one knows two or more scripting languages, he may be confused while selecting a language  for a particular project. How do you decide? For example both RoR and PHP can be used to develop data driven web applications. Also when do you choose between Javascript or PHP or RoR for form field validation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CRUD Scaffold Generator by Kevin Skoglund</title>
		<link>http://www.evilduckie.org/crud-scaffold-generator#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Skoglund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.evilduckie.org/crud-scaffold-generator#comment-80</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Aditya: In general, yes, I prefer Ruby on Rails.  I find it more enjoyable, mostly because I love the Ruby language.  But it’s not necessarily the right tool for every project.  I also like the simplicity and no-fuss of working in PHP.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A client’s needs or project’s requirements are the driving factor in making a language choice.  Some clients already know which language they want for a new project.  Sometimes you will be brought in to work on existing code.  If a client already has a large site in one language, rewriting their site in another might not be in their best interest.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I also factor in the client’s budget, their technical expertise and what ongoing technical support they will have when I complete the project.  Simple sites may not need a full framework like Ruby on Rails.  For clients with small budgets, it can be cheaper and easier for them to find a PHP developer to help them out down the road.  (Rails developers are fewer and in high demand right now.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For form field validation, I do most validation after form submission in PHP or RoR. I use JavaScript when I want to give a different user experience or to correct simple mistakes (like only letting a user check 2 out of 10 checkboxes).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Aditya: In general, yes, I prefer Ruby on Rails.  I find it more enjoyable, mostly because I love the Ruby language.  But it’s not necessarily the right tool for every project.  I also like the simplicity and no-fuss of working in PHP.</p>
<p>A client’s needs or project’s requirements are the driving factor in making a language choice.  Some clients already know which language they want for a new project.  Sometimes you will be brought in to work on existing code.  If a client already has a large site in one language, rewriting their site in another might not be in their best interest.</p>
<p>I also factor in the client’s budget, their technical expertise and what ongoing technical support they will have when I complete the project.  Simple sites may not need a full framework like Ruby on Rails.  For clients with small budgets, it can be cheaper and easier for them to find a PHP developer to help them out down the road.  (Rails developers are fewer and in high demand right now.)</p>
<p>For form field validation, I do most validation after form submission in PHP or RoR. I use JavaScript when I want to give a different user experience or to correct simple mistakes (like only letting a user check 2 out of 10 checkboxes).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
